Advantages of a new technique of neck dissection using an ultrasonic scalpel
Introduction
Excision of cervical lymph nodes in oral cancer was first described by George Crile (1906) as a radical neck dissection. This approach has undergone various modifications but still suffers from a relatively high morbidity. A total of 40–60% of patients present with surgical complications of differing magnitude. Healing disturbances occurred in 61% (Magrin and Kowalski, 2000) of which the most frequent were wound infection and dehiscence. In the series of Baffi et al. (1980), 30% of the patients developed severe postoperative oedema and 14% had a wound infection; the total complication rate was 54%. Cabra Duenas et al. (1994) report on 43% complications in 195 functional neck dissections. These were wound infection (23%), serohaematoma (20%), wound dehiscence (17%), haemorrhage (5.6%) or chylous fistula (2%).
To improve the patient's recovery, the application of modern technology was studied in order to diminish the negative aspects of this surgery. In the ultrasonic-activated (harmonic) scalpel, high-frequency mechanical energy is applied to cut and coagulate using a temperature not exceeding 80 °C without any electrical current (Mantke et al., 2003). This allows tissue dissection and vessel occlusion at the same time with a reduced thermal damage to the surrounding tissue when compared with traditional diathermy (Kinoshita et al., 1999; Emam and Cuschieri, 2003). Effectiveness and a high level of safety have justified the use of this device in dissection of anatomical structures and vessel ligation in laparoscopic surgery (Ortega et al., 2004). Only a few reports have been published about the use of the harmonic scalpel in open surgery (Meurisse et al., 2000; Metternich et al., 2001, Metternich et al., 2003a, Metternich et al., 2003b; Mantke et al., 2003; Ortega et al., 2004) and until now there have been no studies about its value in neck dissection.
The aim of this investigation was to establish whether the ultrasonic activated scalpel could improve the outcome of patients with oral cancer following neck dissection.
Section snippets
Material and methods
A prospective, non-randomized study was undertaken on patients undergoing surgery for oral squamous cell carcinoma with an Ultracision® Harmonic Scalpel (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Germany, Fig. 1) or with the use of scissors and eletrocoagulation. Twenty supraomohyoid neck dissections were performed in both groups by the same team. The characteristics of the patients were balanced and encompassed location of the tumour, TNM staging, age, sex, weight and volume of the dissected tissue as well as the
Results
There was no statistically significant difference between the study and the control group regarding patient demographics, diagnosis, weight and volume of the removed specimens as well as the number of the excised lymphnodes. The operation time (mean±SD) using harmonic scalpel was significantly shorter (52±10 min) than when applying the traditional method (86±22 min; p<0.01; Fig. 2). The blood loss during the ultracision procedure (13±7 ml) was considerably less than in the control group (85±58 ml; p
Discussion
Neck dissection for oral cancer is a well-established method for loco-regional control of the lymphatic spread of the disease. An introduction of new operative techniques based on modern technology improves several negative consequences of the surgery. The mechanism of the harmonic scalpel is based on transforming electrical energy into mechanical movement of 55.5 kHz frequency with a help of a piezo-crystalline device (Lee and Park, 1999; Haegner et al., 2002). The vibrating tip causes a
Conclusion
The use of the harmonic scalpel during neck dissection has numerous advantages: diminished bleeding, shortened operation time, lesser seroma formation and better wound healing when compared with the standard technique using surgical diathermy. This method is promising and worth further investigation in maxillofacial surgery.
References (18)
- et al.
Evaluation of the Ultracision ultrasonic dissector in thyroid surgery: prospective randomized study
Ann Chir
(2000) - et al.
Nonsimultaneous bilateral radical neck dissection
Head Neck Surg
(1980) - et al.
Postoperative complications in patients with functional neck dissection
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp
(1994) Excision of cancer of the head and neck with special reference to the plane of dissection based on one hundred and thirty two operations
J Am Med Assoc
(1906)- et al.
How safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection?
Ann Surg
(2003) - et al.
Die “Ultraschalltonsillektomie” im Vergleich zur konventionellen Tonsillektomie
HNO
(2002) - et al.
Wound healing of skin incisions produced by ultrasonically vibrating knife, scalpel, electrosurgery, and carbon dioxide laser
J Dermatol Surg Oncol
(1988) - et al.
Experimental study on heat production by a 23.5-kHz ultrasonically activated device for endoscopic surgery
Surg Endosc
(1999) - et al.
Ultrasonic energy in endoscopic surgery
Yonsei Med J
(1999)
Cited by (24)
Reduction in perioperative blood loss using ultrasound-activated scissors during tumour surgery
2022, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Similar results were obtained when examining neck dissections performed with HF+ scissors. A significantly reduced duration of surgery with significantly less BL and without significant major disadvantages are advantages of the new surgical method10,11. Technological advances in recent decades have not always led to improved survival rates for oral cancer38.
Neck dissection with harmonic scalpel and electrocautery? A randomised study
2017, Auris Nasus LarynxEarly modification in drainage of interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α best predicts surgical-site infection after cervical neck dissection for oral cancer
2015, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryUltracision Harmonic Scalpel in oral and oropharyngeal cancer resection
2014, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :The generator provides electricity which is transformed into mechanical energy via a system of piezoelectric crystals: expansion and contraction of these crystals set the axial vibration of the blade at a constant frequency of 55.5 kHz. Use of the UHS in head and neck oncological surgery has been discussed by various authors (Jackson et al., 2005; Blankenship et al., 2004; Kos and Engelke, 2007; Salami et al., 2008a, 2008b; Prgomet et al., 2009; Miccoli et al., 2009). Specifically, for use in the oral cavity and oropharynx, procedures of partial and total glossectomy using UHS have been described (Sherman and Davies, 2000; To et al., 2001; Metternich et al., 2002; Yuen and Wong, 2005; Pons et al., 2009), as well as, more recently, tumour resections of the oral-oropharynx cavity and neck dissections through submandibular monoblock (T + N) (Barzan et al., 2010).
Neck dissection with the harmonic scalpel in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity
2014, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryUse of an ultrasonic blade facilitates muscle repair after incision injury
2011, Journal of Surgical ResearchCitation Excerpt :The choice of skeletal muscle dissection instrumentation is made based upon the desire for efficient surgical methods that adequately provide hemostasis, avoid unnecessary tissue damage with accompanying pain and inflammation, and speed the recovery of the wound via muscle regeneration and scar tissue remodeling. Inadequate hemostasis or unnecessary trauma from attempts to induce hemostasis at excessive temperatures can lead to secondary damage and slow the wound healing process [1–5]. Hence, development of methods and means to control intra-operative bleeding while limiting inflammation and muscle fibrosis are of importance.