Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 166-174, April 2010
A systematic review of the effects of bone-borne surgical assisted rapid maxillary expansion☆
Summary
Introduction
A systematic literature review was conducted to find out if bone-borne maxillary expansion with corticotomies is an effective and secure orthodontic/orthopaedic treatment modality, eliminating orthodontic and periodontal side effects of tooth-borne maxillary expansion with corticotomies.
Material and methods
Randomized controlled trials (RCT), controlled clinical trials (CCT) and case series with a sample size
≥
5 were electronically searched in PubMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE Excerpta Medica, CINAHL, Biological Abstracts and CENTRAL till June 2008. Data were extracted by 2 observers.
Results
Ten studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 9 were prospective and 1 was a retrospective case series.
Conclusion
No RCT's or CCT's were published on bone-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME). For expected advantages compared to tooth-borne SARME, only weak evidence was found for less buccal tipping of the teeth used as anchor teeth in tooth-borne expansion. The heterogeneity of the retrieved publications and the wide variety of outcome variables posed serious restrictions on the review of the literature in a quantitative systematic manner. There is a need for well designed clinical trials research on the effects of tooth-borne and bone-borne SARME.
Keywords: review, systematic, palatal expansion technique, osteogenesis, distraction, maxilla, bone-borne, assessment, outcomes
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ This study is part of Eurocran (European Collaboration on Craniofacial Anomalies) and was funded by the EU-Framework-V Program, grant number QLG1-CT-2000-01019.
PII: S1010-5182(09)00112-7
doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2009.06.006
© 2009 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 166-174, April 2010
