« Previous
Next »
Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery
Volume 38, Issue 6
, Pages 436-440
, September 2010
An alternative method to match planned and achieved positions of implants, after virtual planning using cone-beam CT data and surgical guide templates – A method reducing patient radiation exposure (part I)
References
- . Guided implant placement and immediate prothesis delivery using traditional Branemark System abutments: a pilot study of 23 patients. Implant Dent. 2008;17:128–135
- . Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000;29:46–51
- . Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J Periodontol. 2005;76(4):503–507
- . Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. J Periodontol. 2008;79(8):1339–1345
- . Reliability of preoperative planning of an imaged-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:886–893
- . Precision for computer-guided implant placement: using 3D planning software and fixed intraoral reference points. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(3):393–399
- . Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. Sept 9, 2008;[epub ahead of print]
- . Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part II. A clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2006;15(2):117–122
- . Comparison of different registration methods for surgical navigation in craniomaxillofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008;36(2):109–116
- . Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007;35:207–211
- . Can implants be correctly angulated based on surgical templates used for osseointegrated dental implants?. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:409–414
- . Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(7):709–716
- . Accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:571–577
- . Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34(9):816–821
- . In vitro accuracy of a novel registration and targeting technique for image guided template production. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:502–508
- . Prospective randomized clinical comparison of 2 dental implant navigation systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(5):785–790
PII: S1010-5182(09)00201-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.10.025
© 2009 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery
Volume 38, Issue 6
, Pages 436-440
, September 2010
