« Previous
Next »
Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery
Volume 39, Issue 3
, Pages 158-163
, April 2011
Face perception in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and patients with severe Class III malocclusion compared to controls
References
- . Proportions in the upper lip–lower lip–chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010;38:90–95
- . The symmetry of faces. In: Greiner G, Niemann H, Ertl T, Girod B, Seidel HP editor. Vision, modeling, and visualization. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2002;p. 332–339
- . Adolescents with cleft palate: body-image and psychosocial problems. Psychosomatics. 1981;22:97–103
- . Effects of visible and invisible orofacial defects on self-perception and adjustment across developmental areas and gender. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994;31:429–436
- . The stigmatising effect of facial disfigurement. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1986;17:99–108
- . The psychology of left and right. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1976;
- . Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publication; 1940;
- . Three-dimensional analysis of the child cleft face. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37:137–144
- . Facial asymmetry in healthy North American Caucasians. An anthropometrical study. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:70–77
- . A quantitative three-dimensional assessment of soft tissue facial asymmetry of cleft lip and palate adult patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14:739–746
- . Beautiful is good: evidence that the physically attractive are more socially skilled. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1977;13:125–130
- . A computerized photographic assessment of the relationship between skeletal discrepancy and mandibular outline asymmetry. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28:97–102
- . Reliability of a method for computing facial symmetry plane and degree of asymmetry based on 3D data. J Orofac Orthop. 2007;68:477–490
- . Early maxillary orthopedics in CLP cases. Guidelines for surgery. Cleft Palate J. 1978;15:405–411
- . The psychosocial impact of orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120:490–497
- . Computer-assisted anthropometry for outcome assessment of cleft lip. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:1608–1623
- . The influence of mandibular prominence on facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27:129–133
- . Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition. Nature. 1994;372:172–175
- . Cultural and psychologic influences on treatment demand. Semin Orthod. 2000;6:242
- . Stigma, body image, and quality of life in women seeking orthognathic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:225–231
- . The impact of facial asymmetry in visual perception – a 3D data analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:168.e1–168.e8[Discussion 168]
- Meyer-Marcotty P, Alpers GW, Gerdes ABM, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. How orthognathic patients are perceived by others: an eye-tracking study. World J Orthod, in press.
- . Reliability of clinical measurements used in the determination of facial indices. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008;36:279–284
- . Analysis of the cleft-lip nose in submental-vertical view, part I – reliability of a new measurement instrument. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007;35:265–277
- . Relative en- and exophthalmometry in zygomatic fractures comparing optical non-contact, non-ionizing 3D imaging to the Hertel instrument and computed tomography. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2003;31:362–368
- . Validation of in vivo assessment of facial soft-tissue volume changes and clinical application in midfacial distraction: a technical report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:367–380
- . Nasolabial appearance in unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate: a comparison with Eurocleft. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007;35:278–286
- . Method selection in craniofacial measurements: advantages and disadvantages of 3D digitization method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009;37:285–290
- . A triangular flap operation for the primary repair of unilateral cleft of the lip. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1959;23:331–347
- . Method for quantifying facial asymmetry in three dimensions using stereophotogrammetry. Angle Orthod. 1995;65:233–239
- . Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psycho Bull Rev. 1998;5:659–669
- . The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:199–226
- . Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proc Biol Sci. 1999;266:1913–1917
- . Quantitative 3D soft tissue analysis of symmetry prior to and after unilateral cleft lip repair compared with non-cleft persons (performed in Cambodia). J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008;36:431–438
- . Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;72:456–466
- . Facial attractiveness: visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59:156–162
- . The repair of the unilateral cleft lip by the stencil method. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1952;8:115–123
- . Clefting and psychosocial adjustment. Influence of facial aesthetics. Clin Plast Surg. 1993;20:623–631
- . Psychological aspects of cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:407–415
- . Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol. 1994;9:21–25
PII: S1010-5182(10)00109-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.05.001
© 2010 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery
Volume 39, Issue 3
, Pages 158-163
, April 2011
