Epidemiology and treatment outcome of surgically treated mandibular condyle fractures. A five years retrospective study
Introduction
Management of mandibular condyle fractures, one of the most frequent fractures that a maxillofacial surgeon has to handle (Bormann et al., 2009, Chrcanovic et al., 2012, Zachariades et al., 2006, Zhou et al., 2013), remains controversial. The closed reduction has been used for a long time regardless of the type of fracture and displacement. Since then, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) has become widely used.
Surgical management is the only way to achieve the proper reduction of a displaced fracture and should avoid intermaxillary fixation. Despite these advantages, this treatment has a bad reputation due to the possible complications, the main one being damage to the facial nerve with resulting facial palsy. In addition, there are questions remaining about the best osteosynthesis material (OSM) and the surgical approach that should be used.
Studies on condylar fracture are often conducted on small samples of patients and/or a wide range of different OSMs.
We reviewed the condylar fractures managed with ORIF in our department over 5 years. We mainly used 2 types of OSMs, one for subcondylar fractures and one for diacapitular fractures. We used cutaneous approaches only.
We studied: the epidemiology of condylar fractures, the surgical treatment outcomes, types and rates of complications after surgical treatment. The goal of this study is to assess whether or not the surgical treatment of condyle fractures is safe and reliable using specific OSM when possible.
This series of patients is different from the one presented by Meyer et al., in 2008 as no patient of this previous study were included in this paper (Meyer et al., 2008).
Section snippets
Material and methods
141 patients underwent surgical treatment for mandibular condyle fracture between 2005 and 2010 in the maxillofacial surgery department of the university hospital of Strasbourg (Strasbourg, France). 114 patients (80.9%) had unilateral mandibular condyle fracture and 27 (19.1%) had bilateral fractures for a total of 168 mandibular condyle fractures.
Surgical treatment with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) was chosen in patients who presented clinically with either a dysocclusion or and
Results
On the 141 patients, 105 (75%) were males and 36 (25%) were females (sex ratio 3:1). Age of the patients ranged from 8 years to 84 years with a mean of 35 years (SD ± 17.15).
The distribution of each type of fracture is summarized in Table 1, Table 2. The LSCFs stand for almost two thirds (64.8%) of mandibular condyle fractures.
Falls were found to be the main aetiology for condylar fractures in this study (30%). Two other frequent aetiologies were assaults (25 %) and road traffic accidents (RTA)
Discussion
Our study shows very good results of ORIF in condylar fractures regardless of the level of fracture. It has been proved that ORIF provides the best results with more comfort for the patients (Schneider et al., 2008). Ellis stated that the open treatment was associated with faster recovery of mandibular movements (Throckmorton and Ellis, 2000).
Reduction should be particularly good in patients with HSCFs and/or bicondylar fractures, partially edentulous mandible. If the reduction is approximate,
Conclusion
Open reduction internal fixation of condylar fractures is safe and reliable if used within good indications. Anatomical reduction and fixation stability are keys to good healing of the fracture.
For best results, it has to be associated with post-operative physiotherapy.
HSMA and pre-auricular approaches provide good access to the fracture which allows more precise reduction and fixation.
Our study shows good results for the use of specific osteosynthesis materials. These devices allow a stable
Conflict of interest statement
The senior author was involved in the development of TCP plates in cooperation with Medartis®. Nevertheless, the authors received no grants for this study.
Grants
No grants were received by the authors.
References (36)
- et al.
Analysis of the retroauricular transmeatal approach: a novel transfacial access to the mandibular skeleton
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2012) - et al.
Five-year retrospective study of mandibular fractures in Freiburg, Germany: incidence, etiology, treatment, and complications
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2009) - et al.
1,454 mandibular fractures: a 3-year study in a hospital in Belo Horizonte, Brazil
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
(2012) - et al.
Comparative biomechanical evaluation of mono-cortical osteosynthesis systems for condylar fractures using photoelastic stress analysis
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2012) - et al.
Transoral endoscopic-assisted management of subcondylar fractures in 17 patients: an alternative to open reduction with rigid internal fixation and closed reduction with maxillomandibular fixation
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2009) - et al.
Biomechanical study of the Delta plate and the TriLock Delta condyle trauma plate
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2011) - et al.
Comparison of various approaches for the treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
(2012) - et al.
Functional and radiological results of open and closed treatment of intracapsular (diacapitular) condylar fractures of the mandible
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2005) - et al.
Open reduction and rigid internal fixation of mandibular condylar fractures by an intraoral approach: a long-term follow-up study of 15 patients
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2006) - et al.
Plate osteosynthesis of the mandibular condyle
Ann Anat
(2007)
Subclassification of fractures of the condylar process of the mandible
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Retromandibular approach to the mandibular condyle: a clinical and cadaveric study
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Photoelastic analysis of bone deformation in the region of the mandibular condyle during mastication
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
Development and biomechanical testing of a new osteosynthesis plate (TCP) designed to stabilize mandibular condyle fractures
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
Experimental evaluation of three osteosynthesis devices used for stabilizing condylar fractures of the mandible
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
Clinical experience with osteosynthesis of subcondylar fractures of the mandible using TCP plates
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
Modified Risdon approach for the treatment of subcondylar fractures of the mandible
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac
Treatment of intracapsular condylar fractures with resorbable pins
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Cited by (41)
Comparison between endoscopically assisted transoral and high perimandibular approaches for the surgical management of condylar fractures: A retrospective study
2023, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and PathologyPreauricular anteroparotid transmasseteric approach of the mandibular condyle: The natural evolution after cervical dissections? An anatomical feasibility study
2022, Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryA novel ultrasound-guided minimally invasive technique for the treatment of extracapsular condylar fractures
2022, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryMandibular Condylar Fractures
2022, Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North AmericaFixation of subcondylar fractures of the mandible: a randomized clinical trial comparing one trapezoidal plate with two miniplates
2021, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryHigh cervical transmasseteric anteroparotid approach for mandibular condylectomy
2021, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology